Pull Request Review

Thank you for the contribution! I've reviewed PR #52 and overall the changes look good. Here's my detailed feedback:

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Formatting Compliance: All entries follow the repository's formatting guidelines from CLAUDE.md perfectly:

   • Correct arXiv URL format (no www. prefix)
   • Proper structure: [Title](URL): Description | Venue
   • Consistent spacing and punctuation
   • Venue notation follows convention (e.g., MLSys' 26)

2. Appropriate Section Placement: Papers are correctly categorized:

   • Training papers → Pre-training section
   • Serving papers → LLM serving section

3. Good Descriptions: Brief, informative descriptions that highlight each paper's contribution

4. Chronological Ordering: New entries are appended appropriately, maintaining the repository's structure

🔍 Minor Observations

1. Title Length Consistency (Line 245):

   • Scaling Up Efficient Small Language Models Serving has a somewhat verbose title. While this appears to be the actual paper title, consider verifying if the official title matches exactly.

2. Description Specificity (Line 245):

   • "Serving and Deployment for Semantic Job Search" - This description is quite application-specific. Consider whether a more general description of the serving techniques would be more valuable to readers (e.g., highlighting the efficiency methods rather than the specific use case).

3. Venue Consistency:

   • Lines 85, 86, 244, 245, 247: MLSys' 26 papers are mixed with arXiv-only papers. This is fine, but once the official MLSys proceedings are published, consider updating the links to use the official conference URLs for consistency with other venues (e.g., how SOSP and OSDI papers link to conference sites).

📋 Code Quality Assessment

Since this is a documentation-only change:

• ✅ No code bugs: N/A
• ✅ No security concerns: All links are to arxiv.org, a trusted domain
• ✅ No performance impact: Documentation-only
• ✅ No test coverage needed: N/A for documentation

🔗 URL Verification

I recommend verifying these arXiv links are accessible:

• https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17654 (Kareus)
• https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05411 (AXLearn)
• https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20309 (SuperInfer)
• https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22101 (Scaling Up...)
• https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05871 (BestServe)
• https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20408 (OptiKIT)

✨ Overall Assessment

Status: ✅ Approved (Post-merge review)

This is a high-quality contribution that adds valuable recent papers to the repository. The formatting is exemplary and follows all guidelines. The minor observations above are suggestions for potential future improvements but do not detract from the quality of this PR.

Great work maintaining the repository's high standards! 🎉

Review generated via Claude Code